Throughout its history, Wellspring Church has periodically responded to seasons of conflict, uncertainty, or departure by calling the congregation to renewed commitment. These moments are often framed as necessary for unity, faithfulness, or doctrinal clarity. Members are told that “decisions must be made,” and that continued participation requires reaffirming loyalty to the church and its teachings.

​

For many, this language does not feel neutral. It signals a narrowing of acceptable space, where questions must be resolved, doubts must be set aside, and alignment must be demonstrated. While presented as voluntary, these recommitment moments carry real consequences.

 

Those who cannot, in good conscience, affirm what is being asked often experience increased pressure to leave, followed by the loss of relationships, community, and even family connection.

​

This pattern has repeated often enough that its function is recognizable: recommitment serves not as spiritual encouragement, but as an intentional mechanism to consolidate authority and quiet dissent.

​

 

The Cost of “Choice” Under Pressure

​

Members are frequently told that no one is forced to recommit - that each person is free to decide. Yet when the alternatives are clearly understood - public recommitment on one hand, or social and relational loss on the other - the choice is no longer neutral. The choice is bounded and thus without freedom. 

​

In past recommitment moments, those who hesitated or expressed discomfort were not met with open dialogue, patience, or pastoral care. Instead, their hesitation was often reframed as resistance, pride, or lack of submission. Over time, this has taught members that safety lies in compliance, and that honesty carries risk.

​

Scripture does not equate unity with uniformity, nor faithfulness with silence. The New Testament repeatedly warns against coercion that burdens the conscience:

​

"Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom." (2 Corinthians 3:17)

​

When fear of loss becomes the primary motivator for agreement, something has already gone wrong.

 

 

When Sacred Practices Are Used to Apply Pressure

​

In previous instances, recommitment has been followed by communal acts such as footwashing. Footwashing, in Scripture, is a sign of humility, mutual service, and love - not a test of loyalty or a mechanism for enforcing conformity.

​

Jesus washed His disciples’ feet before they understood Him fully, before they agreed with one another, and before they proved faithful. He did not use the act to silence questions or demand allegiance.

​

"If I then, the Lord and the Teacher, washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet." (John 13:14)

​

Footwashing was never intended to frame further questioning as disobedience or to bind consciences after the fact. When a sacred act is placed immediately after a forced recommitment, it can function not as service, but as pressure - implicitly signaling that to disagree now is to resist humility itself.

​

This is a misuse of something meant to be gentle.

​

​

A Warning to Those Feeling Pressured

​

If you are being told that you must recommit - despite unresolved concerns - in order to remain in good standing, hear this clearly:

​

• You are not sinning by hesitating.

• You are not rebellious for asking questions.

• You are not faithless for refusing to affirm what you do not believe.

​

Scripture does not require believers to pledge loyalty to a particular institution in order to remain faithful to Christ.

 

The call of Jesus is not “commit to us or else,” but “Come to me.”

​

"Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest." (Matthew 11:28)

 

Rest and coercion do not grow from the same root.

 

 

Unity That Requires Silence Is Not Biblical Unity

​

Biblical unity is grounded in truth, love, and shared life in Christ - not in enforced agreement or fear of consequence. When unity is maintained by demanding recommitment during moments of tension, it becomes brittle and performative. It may look stable, but it cannot bear weight.

 

True unity allows for:

• conscience

• disagreement

• patience

• time

• correction without threat

Scripture treats the conscience as something sacred, not something to be overridden by pressure or authority. The Apostle Paul exhorts believers to live by “holding faith and a good conscience,” warning that when conscience is violated, spiritual harm follows (1 Timothy 1:19).

 

When people are pressured to recommit despite unresolved conviction - especially through the use of sacred acts meant to express humility and love - the result is not unity but injury. Practices that compel outward agreement while silencing inward conscience do not reflect the freedom of the gospel; they replace trust in God with compliance to a system.

 

A Final Word

​

If you are facing pressure to recommit in order to preserve your relationships, your standing, or your sense of safety, you are not alone - and you are not imagining the weight of that moment. Many before you have felt the same tension, made the same calculations, and paid the same costs.

​

Scripture does not honor decisions made under fear. God does not need coerced vows to secure His people.

​

For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery. (Galatians 5:1)

​

Faithfulness to Christ does not require surrendering your conscience to pressure.

And no church has the authority to demand what only God can receive.