• Relationship Isolation: Wellspring Church encourages close relationships only with approved family and church members, discouraging close outside connections.

• Control Through Isolation: Wellspring restricts relationships to dominate major life decisions — education, friendships, dating, counseling, and more.

• Isolation Within: Often presented as “discipline” or “protection,” Wellspring Church isolates internal members through public discipline as a tool to pressure members into compliance.
   

Relational Isolation

​

One of the most powerful methods used by high-control religious groups, including Wellspring Church, is relational isolation. This coercive tactic limits a person’s relationships to only those within the group and then threatens those relationships whenever the individual shows signs of independence. This is not unique to Wellspring Church; it is a well-documented form of coercive control found in a wide range of high-control groups and systems.

​

Former members have described being cut off from internal friendships, church social activities, and outside influences long before they ever left the church. In some cases, individuals were prohibited from speaking to friends, participating in activities, or seeking outside support, even during moments of personal crisis or mental health distress. These restrictions are not presented as punishment, but as “spiritual protection,” “church discipline,” or “guarding the community.”

​

However, the practical effect is clear: isolation becomes a tool of control.

​​

When a person’s closest relationships are restricted to their immediate family within the church and a small circle of approved members - and when outside friendships are discouraged or forbidden - the community becomes their entire world. The thought of losing that world, even briefly, can feel overwhelming and catastrophic.

​

This means that any threat of isolation, even subtle, creates enormous pressure to conform. When someone is suspended from social contact, barred from friendships, or placed under supervision, they are not simply being “disciplined” - they are being placed in a situation where compliance is the only path back to human connection.

 

Control through Isolation

​

Within this system disagreement is treated as disobedience, independence is treated as rebellion, and ordinary life decisions (education, friendships, dating, counseling, even medical care) become matters that require the church’s approval.​ 

 

Punishments, when enacted, are rarely tied to “sin” in any biblical sense or as the fundamental issue. More often, they are triggered by choices that fall outside the leadership’s control. What is framed as “restoration” or “correction” functions instead as a technique designed to break resistance and force submission.

​

This kind of relational containment is characteristic of coercive spiritual environments: restrict the person’s world, make the group their only source of belonging, and then use that belonging as leverage.

​

True Christian community does not control or confine. It nurtures, protects, and frees. It does not isolate people from relationships; it heals relationships. It does not weaponize community against its own members; it welcomes and restores. When isolation is used as a means of control, it reveals not the heart of Christ, but the mechanisms of domination that Christ Himself condemns.

​

Former members consistently trace this pattern of coercive control back to the leadership style and modeled behavior of Wellspring’s founders, Norman James, and his wife. Their influence shaped not only the leadership structure but also the expectations, habits, and relational patterns of the people in the community. The relational restrictions, decision-making oversight, and isolation practices did not emerge on their own; they were formed through years of teaching, example, and reinforcement.

 

From our limited vantage point, these same dynamics appear to continue under the current leadership, carried forward by a culture that was shaped more by the founders’ patterns than by Scripture or historic Christianity.​

 

How Public Discipline Creates Fear and Conformity

​

In any high-control community, when a member is isolated, restricted, or publicly corrected, everyone else sees it. This visibility is not accidental. It signals to the group what kinds of behavior are unacceptable and creates a climate in which members regulate themselves out of fear rather than freedom. Those who are isolated become living examples - a warning of what may happen to anyone who questions or resists the expectations of leadership.

​

In the experience of some former members, this dynamic has often fallen hardest on the men, young people and especially women who stand outside the inner circle of male power. Individuals who have raised concerns, resisted pressure, or simply made decisions the leadership did not approve of were sometimes met with discipline, restriction, or even removal from the community. When such actions occur with the support or implied consent of the influential male leaders, they can function to reinforce the power structure and discourage others from speaking honestly about their experiences or convictions. A few highly visible cases send a strong message to the entire community: Do not step out of line.

​

Over time, Wellspring appears to have maintained control not primarily through conviction, but through fear of relational loss - especially the loss of family. This fear falls unevenly across the community, often placing the heaviest burden on women, who are trained toward submission while facing the greatest risk of isolation if they resist. Many remain not because they believe, but because leaving would mean losing the people they love. In such an environment, those least constrained by empathy often gain power, while those who care most deeply are the most vulnerable.

​

This pattern stands in deep contrast to the teaching and example of Jesus Christ. Leaders in the church are called to be servants, not overlords (Mark 10:42–45). Biblical submission is never a license for coercion or control; it is always anchored in the character of Christ and upheld by love. Wherever fear replaces love, and coercion replaces care, the pattern no longer reflects the heart of the Triune God. Scripture speaks of mutual love, honor, and self-giving service between men and women - not domination, intimidation, or fear. Husbands are commanded to love their wives as Christ loved the church - sacrificially, gently, and with protective care (Ephesians 5:25).

​

From the outside, it appears that some of Wellspring’s practices reflect the power structures established in earlier years and carried forward through the community’s culture. Former members describe an environment shaped more by the patterns of human authority than by the freedom and grace found in Christ. Whether or not this is the intention of the current leadership, the effect is the same: a system where fear reinforces conformity, and visible discipline keeps others silent.

​